Despite my love of
animals, I hadn’t seen Oliver and Company
until this project. It never really appealed to me, for some odd reason.
Perhaps I could tell by the previews and trailers that it just wasn’t up my
alley. There are a lot of wonderful aspects about it, but it isn’t one I think
I’ll watch again and again, like many of the other films from this project.
I haven’t read “Oliver Twist” so I can’t say how much Disney
strays from the original. I think it’s a nice thought to imagine that perhaps
some kids, who liked this film, will one day read the original. Disney
specializes in adaptations; they truly make the material available to a wider
audience and introduce the original to that same broad audience. They have to
adapt the material for young kids, but saying Disney butchers any classic is
unfair. Many people, trying to set themselves apart as different, say they
dislike Disney because their adaptations alter the original material, often adjusting
adult topics to be suitable for young audiences. First of all, every adaptation
will differ from the original; that’s why it’s called an adaptation. Different
mediums require different adjustments. Many who read a book and then see a
movie based on the book prefer the book version. That doesn’t always mean the
studio destroyed the original in adapting it; it means more people are now
aware of the original. Secondly, how many kids could tell you the basic plot of
classic fairy tales, books and folk lore without the help of Disney? From Snow White
to Dickens to Johnny Appleseed, these characters have come alive in children’s
imaginations and inspire them, as they grow, to seek out the original.
Different isn’t bad, it’s just different.
Back to Oliver, the cuddly little kitten who finds his
way into a thieving band of outcasts. The opening of the film is heartbreaking,
as each of Oliver’s brothers and sisters find new homes, with only him
remaining. His struggle during a rainstorm and finding food and safety in New
York City are equally heartbreaking. Then Dodger comes along, and you have a
little bit of hope. The problem is that one song later, that hope is dashed and
you want to bump Dodger on the behind with a newspaper for being such a
meanie-face.
Poor sad little Oliver. |
Dodger tricks Oliver into helping him, then refuses to
share the reward. Oliver, being the spunky cat that he is, refuses to be ignored,
and follows Dodger home. He finds his way into this family of homeless dogs,
and a man (the voice of Itchy from All
Dogs Go to Heaven, actually), who trick and thieve to stay alive. The man
owes money to the villain, who has two scary looking Dobermans that are equally
mean to the misfit gang.
When the film was originally pitched, it was meant to be
a sequel to The Rescuers. When that
didn’t work out, all that was left was a New York setting and a little girl who
looks remarkable like Penny, except her name is Jenny and her rich, jet-setting
parents are never home. Her sadness is palpable, which makes the gang’s ‘rescue’
of Oliver, after Jenny finds him and sings the one good song in the movie to
him and clearly loves him, all the worse. Oliver is separated from his person,
which in every film with animals always makes me cry, and has to tell his old
new-friends that his new-new friend needs him and is where his heart really
lies. So sad.
Jenny and Oliver during the one good song in the movie. |
The downside is the Broadway-esque show dog that lives in
Jenny’s house. I’m not sure whose pet she’s supposed to be, but Georgette does
not like Oliver and helps to rid the house of him. Then a misguided Fagin, the
homeless owner of the dog gang, decides he’ll ransom Oliver, since he’s there
and Fagin is desperate. Sadly, Penny brings her piggy bank, and Georgette as
protection, to the docks to Fagin in order to get Oliver back. She is then
kidnapped by the villain, who is always smoking and was apparently a linebacker
before becoming a loan shark, which also made me sad. Children being kidnapped
is just too real these days, and I have trouble watching films that contain it
without being heartbroken for the families it happens to. On top of that, Oliver and Jenny have just been reunited when their happy moment is destroyed by further separation.
It’s always eerie to see films, live action or animated,
set in New York before 9/11. The presence of the twin towers now is as jarring
to me as their absence was after that tragic day. The look of the film is
supposed to be reminiscent of 101
Dalmatians, but just looks outdated and sloppy. More CGI use was pioneered during
this time, but it’s still not used frequently. Rotating camera shots, as
opposed to straight-on shots, also occur during this film, improving the cinematography.
Cinematographers also spent time photographing New York as a dog would see it—18
inches off the ground. This helped make the film much more believable. During
Dodger’s first singing-in-the-street scene, dogs from the other Disney features
make cameos. Pongo (101 Dalmatians)
is most obvious, followed by characters from Lady and the Tramp.
The music is
very 1980’s, which dates the movie significantly. Music from the classics, such
as Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, and Lion
King are all still enjoyable to listen to, regardless of what decade you’re
living during. But Oliver’s music is decidedly 80’s, which honestly I really
don’t like. Sorry, Billy Joel, but your Disney music let me down. Billy Joel
also voiced Dodger, which is great. It’s just the music that’s lacking, and it’s
only because after living during the 80’s and both mini-comebacks, I’m rather
80’s’d out.
The one thing I really enjoyed about Oliver is the characterization. Each dog and person you meet is
clearly an individual, from the Shakespeare loving Francis, to the salsa loving
Tito, to the intellectually challenged Einstein. The characters are much more real
because individual dogs do have individual personalities; it was especially
nice to see that in a film.
I
love animal movies, especially dog movies, and while Oliver was enjoyable, it wasn’t repeat-enjoyable for me. I liked it
well enough for once, but I don’t feel like I’ll be losing anything by not
watching it again for a few years or decades.
No comments:
Post a Comment