A lot of important messages have been shared in Disney
animation over the years. Both here and in Meet
the Robinson’s the lesson is that it’s not uncool to be terrifically smart.
Intelligence is important; if there’s one thing you take from The Sword in the Stone, it’s that. The
flip side is that you also have to find who you are and not just really on some
eccentric old wizard to tell you.
When I first put the movie in and hit play, James realized
that this was the same Sword in the Stone
he loved growing up; he recognized it instantly as his favorite Disney
movie. I felt a lot of pressure instantly to like it, if only because he obviously
does. I enjoyed it quite a bit, but it’s not one I think I’d just watch
randomly for fun. At the same time, it’s not one I wouldn’t watch if someone
else wanted to. It’s a bit odd, I know; I might not choose it (Lion King is always first choice for
me), but I’d still enjoy watching it again. There are a lot of funny moments,
word play, and allusions to modern things that are witty. I laughed a lot while
watching it, which is a good sign.
James’ favorite character is Merlin, but mine is Archimedes, the owl. He reminded me of Owl, from Winnie the Pooh, who ironically used to scare me when I was little. But as a grown-up (well, as much of a grown-up as one can be when really a child a heart), he didn’t scare me a bit. I loved that he was smart and stood up to Merlin; I loved how his feathers ruffled when he was upset (or, perhaps, ruffled? Clearly I should leave the word play to Bill Peet, the screenwriter for the film). Archimedes is the only character to stand up to Merlin and is thankfully by Arthur’s side when he pulls the sword (along with the funny line, saying “I told you to leave that sword alone!”). James loves how interesting Merlin is; how he’s been to the future (I keep calling it time travel; James says he lived life backwards, so he knows what’s going to happen but not the specifics of what’s happening while the story takes place). I can sort of see how the Genie, from Aladdin, is a comic spin-off of Merlin. They’re both magical and mystical, both are a little bit in their own little world. Merlin is a really interesting character, but he’s a bit of an “I’m always right and you just have to deal with it and if you die while learning, well, at least you learned something” kind of guy. When he doesn’t have precisely his way, he flies of to 20th century Bermuda. What’s so wrong with Wart/Arthur becoming a squire anyway? If he hadn’t gone to London, he wouldn’t have pulled the sword, after all. So take that, Merlin!
James’ favorite character is Merlin, but mine is Archimedes, the owl. He reminded me of Owl, from Winnie the Pooh, who ironically used to scare me when I was little. But as a grown-up (well, as much of a grown-up as one can be when really a child a heart), he didn’t scare me a bit. I loved that he was smart and stood up to Merlin; I loved how his feathers ruffled when he was upset (or, perhaps, ruffled? Clearly I should leave the word play to Bill Peet, the screenwriter for the film). Archimedes is the only character to stand up to Merlin and is thankfully by Arthur’s side when he pulls the sword (along with the funny line, saying “I told you to leave that sword alone!”). James loves how interesting Merlin is; how he’s been to the future (I keep calling it time travel; James says he lived life backwards, so he knows what’s going to happen but not the specifics of what’s happening while the story takes place). I can sort of see how the Genie, from Aladdin, is a comic spin-off of Merlin. They’re both magical and mystical, both are a little bit in their own little world. Merlin is a really interesting character, but he’s a bit of an “I’m always right and you just have to deal with it and if you die while learning, well, at least you learned something” kind of guy. When he doesn’t have precisely his way, he flies of to 20th century Bermuda. What’s so wrong with Wart/Arthur becoming a squire anyway? If he hadn’t gone to London, he wouldn’t have pulled the sword, after all. So take that, Merlin!
Archimedes the owl from Sword in the Stone |
Owl from Winnie the Pooh |
Once again, expectations came into play. I was expecting
the sword to be pulled in the beginning of the film, and for his journey from
child to adult would go from there. But the sword doesn’t get pulled until the
end of the film, with his journey from insecure, clumsy, kind-of-smart kid into
an insecure, clumsy smart kind of kid. I was disappointed with the beginning of
the movie because of this, but once James told me it was more about his journey
to the sword instead of after it, I relaxed and began to enjoy the movie more.
Once sequence I particularly loved was when they were
squirrels. Merlin turns himself and Wart/Arthur into squirrels, and a female
squirrel immediately falls in love with Wart/Arthur—as a squirrel! She chases
him and takes all of his negative responses as acquiescence, and does his own
pushing-away moves back to him. It’s all quite fun and games until someone gets
their heart broken. She rushes down to save her love from the wolf, putting
herself in danger. She saves him, and tricks the wolf into jumping off a cliff.
While she’s hugging her squirrel-love, he turns back into a boy. She’s
heartbroken and runs away. The last we see of her, she’s standing at the top of
a tree, looking sad and heartbroken that her love has gone. I was so sad for
her. James saw my face and said, “I know, it’s sad. And that’s the last we see
of her. I remember thinking that when I was a kid, too.” So we never find out what
happens to her; her fate is especially confusing, as Merlin said that squirrels
mate for life. Does that mean she’ll go through life alone now?
The Sword in the
Stone is unique for Disney in a lot of ways. First, it had only one
director; one of the nine old men, Woolie Reithermen, directed it. Secondly,
Walt read the story, purchased the rights, and had Bill Peet write a screenplay
for it before he’d decide to do it. Bill Peet wrote the screenplay, as opposed to
the storyboarding technique that was typically used to write animated features.
Bill Peet also did the character design for Merlin. He
modeled Merlin on Walt himself; he even gave Merlin Walt’s nose! Walt was
loved, but he was also argumentative and he didn’t like when people tried to
change his mind after he’d made a decision. Bill Peet apparently saw a lot of
Walt in Merlin, and so he used Walt as inspiration for Merlin without Walt’s
knowledge.
On to special features! I was a bit disappointed with the
little Backstage Disney features. There was a scrapbook on the film, which you
could digitally flip through. It was mostly concept art. Concept art is
interesting because it shows you what the artists were thinking in the earliest
stages of production. It’s always interesting to see how a character changes
over time, along with the story changing. My favorite special features are the bonus
shorts. Two short cartoons, one starring Goofy and one starring Mickey, are included
on the disc. “Knight for a day” is Goofy’s, while Mickey’s has to do with
capturing a giant.
My favorite-favorite special feature is an excerpt from
the DisneyLand TV show, starring Walt, as he gives a tour of the ‘magic
basement’ at the studio. He does a few magic tricks and promotes the film. He
even calls in the Mirror, from Snow White,
to help him out. I love old footage of Walt; it’s so interesting to see him
talk about his films. When you see someone who really loves what they’re doing,
it shows. Walt really loved what he was doing, and it’s so easy to see.
The xerography animation technique is again used in The Sword, having come out only two
years after 101 Dalmatians. It’s not
my favorite, as it looks a bit grainy (I don’t believe it’s been digitally re-mastered
yet). Unfortunately it’s what they use until the 80’s, so I have a few more movies
to go until another technique is used.
I can’t talk about this movie without mentioning the
transformation scenes during Merlin and Madame Mim’s Wizard Duel. It’s a true
testament to brains over brawn, as Madame Mim is all brawn and Merlin is, quite
frankly, all brains. Does Madame Mim’s voice sound familiar? Perhaps it’s
because she also voiced Nanny in 101
Dalmatians. Two animated features in a row set in England, of course they
had to re-use some voice talent. She does have a marvelous voice. It’s always
interesting to hear a voice with such a different character. Nanny is so sweet
and doting, while Madame Mim loves all things evil and terrible. They change
into many different things, but you can always tell who is Madame Mim and who
is Merlin. It’s such a fun scene. I especially love when Merlin turns into a
walrus and lands on Madame Mim, pushing her into the ground.
The Sword in the
Stone was enjoyable. I tend to like stories with strong female leads, and
there’s not a single female lead in the entire movie. I think James is more
drawn to it because all the good characters are very smart, which sends a great
message. It also has a scrawny kid, who becomes a smart, strong man. Although
it’s a British story, it really exemplifies the American dream. Arthur/Wart
wasn’t well thought of, he was mostly ignored, he was scrawny and small, yet he
became this incredibly smart man, a legend, a great leader. He could become
anything he wanted because of his intelligence. Smarts are important, as is
standing up for yourself. Once he had the smarts, he stood up to Merlin (eek!)
and became who he was destined to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment